Views: 13
LackLuster-Cops Pull Over Man F
Full Unedited Video: https://youtu.be/ADZUCYXALWM
Submit your video for me to review: Lack@LackLusterVideo.com
Or through Facebook Messenger: https://www.facebook.com/LackLusterVideos
OR at https://lacklustervideo.com/videos
—Gear Recommendations—
Body Cam: https://amzn.to/2W5cEBh
Gimbal: https://amzn.to/2KkCmiM
GoPro: https://amzn.to/2W7UC1b
DashCam (pricey): https://amzn.to/3aHL5pO
DashCam (mid range): https://amzn.to/3mueNBv
DashCam (cheap): https://amzn.to/37uQkaW
—Channel Members—
Tony Routledge
Dennis Anderson
Shane Bushta
david cat & bus
JILL REITER
Bill B.
James B.
R and R
Dwaine Miller
Ken Hogg
Witch Hunt
Charles Clarke
Keiran Tibbits
Bob Lau
laura miller
Candie Anderson
NOTTXSHEEPDOG88
Bob Balue
Annie V
Lynne Huffman
Ron Macaire
Wally Lumpkin
Justin Stringfield
Chris Naumann
FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.
Disclaimer: NONE of my videos should be considered a "call to action." The content is created to be educational or is newsworthy and of interest to the public.
I am not an attorney. My videos should not be construed as legal advice. You should seek legal counsel if you believe that you are a victim of police misconduct. The facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion. Laws, case law, ordinances, policies, legal doctrine, and all other jurisprudence is subject to the interpretation of the court. The videos shown are designed to be educational, and informative. They should never serve as legal advice under any circumstances. The content provided is in no way intended to provoke, incite or shack the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens about constitutionally protected activities, law, and civilian rights, and to emphasize the importance of constitutional awareness. All claims made are alleged.
Bonner County, Kansas. This man was traveling through town and noticed an officer following him. He alleges the officer made an illegal u-turn and followed him for 4 turns through town, but only the last 2 turns are shown in the video.
35 seconds in, the man is order to exit the vehicle, and on any legal traffic stop, this is a lawful order.
The officer makes several claims that we can unpack here. First, he says that the driver refused to identify, but the video I watched showed the driver handing over his ID. He did stall and asked questions regarding the nature of the stop, as he is clearly agitated for being pulled over for something so petty. Not using his turn signal 100 feet prior to the stop.
Kansas Statutes Chapter 8 section 1548 covers turning movements and required signals and states that A signal of intention to turn or move right or left when required shall be given continuously during not less than the last one hundred (100) feet traveled by the vehicle before turning.
When observing the vehicle approaching the corner and observing when the turn signal was activated, we can see that it begins to flash at the end of this fence. When viewing the location on google maps and using the key offered on the page, it is clear that the driver only used his turn signal for 50 ft.
My issue with the enforcement of this statute is the blanket 100 feet. The speed limit on this street was 30mph, and if the driver was traveling 30 mph, he would travel 100 ft in 2.13 seconds.
The maximum speed limit in Kansas is 75 Mph, and at that speed, 100 feet is traveled in about 9/10ths of a second.
The law is written to enforce a distance used, rather than the time a motorist would have to react. A controlled study in the year 2000 found average driver reaction brake time to be 2.3 seconds, rendering the 100ft statute ineffective.
Given that the officer is observed following the driver for at least 3 of the 4 turns suggested by the driver, it is clear that the officer was targeting the individual. The reason may never be known, but this style of policing is the tip of the iceberg for why no one feels safe when law enforcement is nearby while driving. In this case, the officer was not out to serve and protect the public, as there was no one around.
Officer Carpio leaves to write up the ticket while the driver engages in conversation with the sergeant. I will link the full unedited video below in the event you want to hear what was said.
#1stAmendment #Audit #CopsOwned
Views: 13
