Views: 15
Direct D-Thug Cop Criminalizes A Consensual Encou
Exposing Criminal Cops:
A Police Officer in Belton, Texas becomes unstable when confronted about his comments to independent journalist – “Bully Back Audits” He then uses his authority as a police officer to unlawfully detain the man against his will, in an attempt to allegedly issue a trespass WARNING. Which means he wasn’t suspected of committing any crimes. Be sure to subscribe!
Subscribe here: https://youtube.com/@bullybackaudits
His Video: https://youtu.be/5RortsdJmFo
Order Merchandise here:
https://outfitterfreedom.com
https://Directdofficial.com
————–
Second channel:
https://youtube.com/c/IDon%E2%80%99tAnswerQuestions
—————–
Legal References:
Texas Penal Code – PENAL § 30.05. Criminal Trespass
(a) A person commits an offense if the person enters or remains on or in property of another, including residential land, agricultural land, a recreational vehicle park, a building, or an aircraft or other vehicle, without effective consent and the person:
(1) had notice that the entry was forbidden; or
(2) received notice to depart but failed to do so.
(b) For purposes of this section:
(1) “Entry” means the intrusion of the entire body.
(2) “Notice” means:
(A) oral or written communication by the owner or someone with apparent authority to act for the owner;
(B) fencing or other enclosure obviously designed to exclude intruders or to contain livestock;
(C) a sign or signs posted on the property or at the entrance to the building, reasonably likely to come to the attention of intruders, indicating that entry is forbidden;
(D) the placement of identifying purple paint marks on trees or posts on the property, provided that the marks are:
(i) vertical lines of not less than eight inches in length and not less than one inch in width;
(ii) placed so that the bottom of the mark is not less than three feet from the ground or more than five feet from the ground; and
(iii) placed at locations that are readily visible to any person approaching the property and no more than:
(a) 100 feet apart on forest land; or
(b) 1,000 feet apart on land other than forest land; or
(E) the visible presence on the property of a crop grown for human consumption that is under cultivation, in the process of being harvested, or marketable if harvested at the time of entry.
https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/PE/htm/PE.30.htm
———————-
https://www.abc15.com/news/senate-rules-committee-to-determine-constitutionality-of-police-recording-prohibition-bill
——————–
This video is intended for information, news and other entertainment & education purposes and is not legal advice
—————————
FAIR USE**
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
FAIR USE DEFINITION:
(Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use)
Fair use is a doctrine in the United States copyright law that allows limited use of copyrighted material without requiring permission from the rights holders, such as for commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching or scholarship. It provides for the legal, non-licensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author’s work under a four-factor balancing test. The term “fair use” originated in the United States. A similar principle, fair dealing, exists in some other common law jurisdictions. Civil law jurisdictions have other limitations and exceptions to copyright.
U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE- FAIR USE DEFINITION
(Source: http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html)
One of the rights accorded to the owner of copyright is the right to reproduce or to authorize others to reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords. This right is subject to certain limitations found in sections 107 through 118 of the copyright law (title 17, U.S. Code). One of the more important limitations is the doctrine of “fair use”. The doctrine of fair use has developed through a substantial number of court decisions over the years and has been codified in section 107 of the copyright law.
Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
#cops #police #livepd #arizona #justice #breakingnews #new #law #lawyers #firstamendmentaudit #firstresponders #police #copblock
Views: 15
