Views: 6
LackLuster-Detained For What!?
FaCial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CC9zaMUbXng
Immigration and Nationality Act: https://www.uscis.gov/laws-and-policy/legislation/immigration-and-nationality-act
Submit your video for me to review: Lack@LackLusterVideo.com
Or through Facebook Messenger: https://www.facebook.com/LackLusterVideos
OR at https://lacklustervideo.com/videos
—Gear Recommendations—
Body Cam: https://amzn.to/2W5cEBh
Gimbal: https://amzn.to/2KkCmiM
GoPro: https://amzn.to/2W7UC1b
Radar/Laser Detector $$$: https://amzn.to/37LtQC2
Radar/Laser Detector $$: https://amzn.to/3bGyZfQ
Radar/Laser Detector $: https://amzn.to/3qVIiPz
DashCam $$$: https://amzn.to/3aHL5pO
DashCam $$: https://amzn.to/3mueNBv
DashCam $: https://amzn.to/37uQkaW
—Social Media—
https://wlo.link/@LackLuster
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LackLusterVideos/
BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lackluster/
DISCORD: https://discord.gg/DCzTq4x
Twitter: https://twitter.com/DaleHillerYT
Instagram: lackluster_media
2nd Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtj-_HlsiOHIZpdjIWsFi_w
Live Streams: https://www.twitch.tv/lacklusterlive
IOS MEMBERSHIPS: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbEPXqDvej-3mciZxwYmdew/join
—Channel Members—
Tony Routledge
Dennis Anderson
Shane Bushta
david cat & bus
JILL REITER
Bill B.
James B.
R and R
Dwaine Miller
Witch Hunt
Charles Clarke
Ken Hogg
Keiran Tibbits
Bob Lau
laura miller
Candie Anderson
Bob Balue
Annie V
Lynne Huffman
Ron Maguire
Wally Lumpkin
Justin Stringfield
Martin Whalley
madcat61207
Bowen Deming
Karl P
Lori Miller
Tiffany LaBeau
H HAMMOUD
neuroticknight
FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.
Disclaimer: NONE of my videos should be considered a "call to action." The content is created to be educational or is newsworthy and of interest to the public.
I am not an attorney. My videos should not be construed as legal advice. You should seek legal counsel if you believe that you are a victim of police misconduct. The facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion. Laws, case law, ordinances, policies, legal doctrine, and all other jurisprudence is subject to the interpretation of the court. The videos shown are designed to be educational, and informative. They should never serve as legal advice under any circumstances. The content provided is in no way intended to provoke, incite or shock the viewer. My content was created to educate citizens about constitutionally protected activities, law, and civilian rights, and to emphasize the importance of constitutional awareness. All claims made are alleged.
The officer doesn’t allege any violations and suggests the detention is because he doesn’t know who is in the back seat.
He mentions the immigration and nationality act multiple times. Referring specifically to sections 287 and 387. There is no section 387, but section 287 covers the Powers of immigration officers and employees. Which allows them, without warrant to board and search any vehicle within a reasonable distance from any external boundary of the United States. Which The federal government defines as 100 air miles.
The issue with this definition is that 2/3rds of the nation's population resides within that expanded border region. While technically legal, the powers of immigration officers are often argued as being unconstitutional.
Section 287 does not grant an immigration officer the authority to detain anyone without reasonable suspicion. When asked, officer Esparza suggests that the reason for the detention is because he can't see who is in the back seat, which is not a sufficient reason to pull over a vehicle. Neither is the race or ethnicity of the passenger.
After speaking with Will, he told me that he spent about 3 years in prison for transporting undocumented aliens. The incident occured over 15 years ago, but he speculates that when an officer runs his license plate – that information is shown to the officer.
Probable cause/reasonable suspicion determinations are almost never decided based on a single factor. Generally they will be made on a "totality of the circumstances" test. Criminal priors may be a relevant part of that determination. If that is the case, that would mean that the officer pulled them over based on the ethnicity of the passenger and Will’s prior conviction, and probably neither would be acceptable reasons for a detention if taken to court.
#1stAmendment #Audit #CopsOwned
Views: 6
